Fri, Aug 15, 2008 5:35pm ET

Send to a friend Print Version

Wash. Times uncritically repeated McCain campaign's statement that Obama "voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time"

Summary: A Washington Times article uncritically repeated an assertion by Sen. John McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds that "[i]n the Senate, Barack Obama has voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time" and did not mention that, according to Congressional Quarterly, McCain voted with the Bush administration 95 percent of the time in 2007 and has voted with Bush 90 percent of the time over the course of Bush's presidency.

In an August 14 Washington Times article, reporter Christina Bellantoni uncritically repeated an assertion by Sen. John McCain campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds that "[i]n the Senate, Barack Obama has voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time, including the Bush-Cheney Energy bill which gave close to $3 billion in new giveaways to Big Oil." But Bellantoni did not report that according to the nonpartisan publication Congressional Quarterly, which tracks legislators' votes, McCain voted with the Bush administration 95 percent of the time in 2007 and has voted with Bush 90 percent of the time over the seven-and-a-half years of Bush's presidency.

Further, while Bellantoni uncritically quoted Bounds' claim that Obama voted for an energy bill that "gave close to $3 billion in new giveaways to Big Oil" and uncritically repeated a McCain campaign statement that asserted Obama "voted for the Bush energy bill in 2005, which gave tax breaks to Big Oil," a February 27, 2007, Congressional Research Service report found that although the bill "included several oil and gas tax incentives, providing about $2.6 billion of tax cuts for the oil and gas industry," it also "provided for $2.9 billion of tax increases on the oil and gas industry, for a net tax increase on the industry of nearly $300 million over 11 years":

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT05, P.L. 109-58) included several oil and gas tax incentives, providing about $2.6 billion of tax cuts for the oil and gas industry. In addition, EPACT05 provided for $2.9 billion of tax increases on the oil and gas industry, for a net tax increase on the industry of nearly $300 million over 11 years. Energy tax increases comprise the oil spill liability tax and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank financing rate, both of which are imposed on oil refineries. If these taxes are subtracted from the tax subsidies, the oil and gas refinery and distribution sector received a net tax increase of $1,356 million ($2,857 million minus $1,501 million).

From Bellantoni's August 14 Washington Times article:

But Team McCain pointed out in a statement that Mr. Obama voted for the Bush energy bill in 2005, which gave tax breaks to Big Oil.

"In the Senate, Barack Obama has voted in lockstep with President George W. Bush nearly half the time, including the Bush-Cheney Energy bill which gave close to $3 billion in new giveaways to Big Oil - a terrible policy that John McCain opposed," said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds. "The truth is Barack Obama's plan is a job-killing machine that ignores the struggling economy and raises taxes on family savings, Social Security and small businesses."

—T.A.

Comments (25) - Join the Discussion
 
Take Action!

Contact information:

The Washington Times
Washington Times

Washington Times
3600 New York Ave NE
Washington, DC 20002-1947
(202) 636-3000

When contacting the media, please be polite and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and be sure to indicate exactly what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.

Issues / Media Tags Help
Issues:
Government and Elections
Science and Environment
Sub-Issues:
2008 Elections
Energy Policy
Topic:
Barack Obama
Person:
Christina Bellantoni
Network/Outlet:
The Washington Times
Personalized Alerts
Show Your Support
County Fair
Radioactive
Media Matters Action Center - Make a Difference!
RSS Feeds

Media Matters uses a taxonomy structure to help readers find information on various subjects. You can view all items by issue (the broadest category), view an issue's subissue, and even drill down to a particular topic. You can also look at items according to the related media personality, show/publication and network/publisher.

Social bookmarking sites allow you to save links to interesting items and share them with other users. Some, like Digg.com, also allow you to discuss these items and promote them to wider audiences by "digging" the ones that you like. To start using these services, simply register with the site in question.