<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Jonathan Weisman</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/jonathan_weisman</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Jonathan Weisman</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x27;s &#x3C;/em&#x3E;Weisman ignored actual criteria used in study finding McCain voted with Bush 90 percent of the time</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200809050022</link>
<description>In an online chat, Jonathan Weisman claimed of the finding that Sen. John McCain voted in line with President Bush 90 percent of the time, &#x22;The 90 percent figure is true, but I cover Congress. The vast majority of those votes are procedural, and virtually every member of Congress votes with his or her leadership on procedural motions.&#x22; In fact, &#x3C;em&#x3E;Congressional Quarterly&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s finding that McCain had voted with Bush 90 percent of the time was based on an analysis of &#x22;votes where the editors of Congressional Quarterly determined that President Bush had taken a clear position prior to the vote.&#x22; &#x3C;em&#x3E;CQ&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not indicate the &#x22;vast majority&#x22; of the votes were procedural.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200809050022</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Sep 2008 19:38:44 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; purported to give both sides of &#x22;Born-Alive&#x22; bill dispute, but left out Illinois&#x27; reported position</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808200008</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that &#x22;[a]bortion foes are now accusing [Sen. Barack] Obama of being an abortion-rights extremist&#x22; and purported to give the views of both the proponents and opponents of the &#x22;Born-Alive Infants Protection Act,&#x22; which Obama voted against as an Illinois state senator. But at no point did the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; note that the Illinois Department of Public Health had reportedly said that the alleged conduct the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; identified as having been the impetus for the bill was already illegal.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808200008</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:47:23 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post &#x3C;/em&#x3E;did not challenge examples cited by McCain aide denouncing smears of Obama  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200808020001</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; reported that McCain aide Mark Salter said Sen. John McCain would not &#x22;tolerate&#x22; racially tinged attacks. According to the article, Salter noted that McCain &#x22;denounced&#x22; Bill Cunningham&#x27;s controversial remarks about Sen. Barack Obama and that he &#x22;criticized&#x22; an ad by the North Carolina GOP. But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not challenge Salter&#x27;s claims: In fact, the McCain campaign reportedly invited Cunningham to a rally despite his history of controversial remarks, and McCain reportedly did not take steps to stop the ad from airing.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200808020001</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:27:01 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media report McCain &#x22;mocking&#x22; Obama for laying out Iraq, Afghanistan policy before visiting, but McCain has done the same</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807170012</link>
<description>Several media outlets, including CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, and &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, have uncritically reported Sen. John McCain&#x27;s speech attacking Sen. Barack Obama for &#x22;outlining a plan&#x22; for Afghanistan and Iraq before his upcoming visit to the region without noting that in the same speech, McCain outlined his own &#x22;Comprehensive Strategy For Victory In Afghanistan,&#x22; but hasn&#x27;t visited that country since December 2006.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807170012</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:39:48 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media continue to falsely claim Clark criticized McCain&#x27;s service  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010005</link>
<description>Several media reports falsely claimed that Wesley Clark criticized Sen. John McCain&#x27;s military service during a June 29 appearance on CBS&#x27; &#x3C;em&#x3E;Face the Nation&#x3C;/em&#x3E;, including CNN anchor John Roberts, who said that &#x22;Clark took a weekend hit at McCain, targeting his history as a war hero and his possible future as president.&#x22; In fact, Clark praised McCain as &#x22;a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands of millions of others in the Armed Forces as a prisoner of war.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2008 16:42:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; ignored own role in creating false Love Canal story about Gore  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805280010</link>
<description>&#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; asserted that &#x22;Republicans tarred [Al Gore] in 2000 as someone who claimed to have discovered the Love  Canal disaster and invented the Internet.&#x22; But the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; did not note that the Love Canal smear was based on a falsehood originating in &#x3C;em&#x3E;The New York Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; and&#x3C;em&#x3E; The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; itself, nor did it note that Gore never claimed to have &#x22;invented the Internet.&#x22;  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805280010</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:57:55 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash. Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Weisman: &#x22;I think McCain has&#x22; released his tax returns -- he hasn&#x27;t  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200803050012</link>
<description>Responding to a question about the presidential candidates and the release of their tax returns, &#x3C;em&#x3E;The Washington Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x27;s Jonathan Weisman stated in a discussion on washingtonpost.com: &#x22;[Sen. Barack] Obama has released his tax returns, and I think [Sen. John] McCain has too.&#x22; In fact, McCain has not released his tax returns.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200803050012</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:50:09 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wash.&#x3C;/em&#x3E;&#x3C;em&#x3E;  Post&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Weisman: &#x22;How  about Obama blowing up the Sears Tower! ... (Just kidding,  folks.)&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709210016</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:45:38 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>