<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Media Matters - Matt Drudge</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/tools/syndication/tag_rss/matt_drudge</link>
<description>This link is for use by RSS-enabled software to retrieve Media Matters items matching the term: Matt Drudge</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008, Media Matters for America</copyright>

<item>
<title>&#x27;08 SHOCK: Drudge still smearing, distorting quotes, and touting fake allegations</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200811040016</link>
<description>Media critics have recently postulated that while Matt Drudge may have once set the media&#x27;s agenda, his influence has waned and his efforts to inject himself in the media&#x27;s coverage of the presidential election have largely fallen flat. This election season, Drudge has posted a long series of items that were false on their face or turned out to be false, making the strong case that, if his influence is not in fact waning, it should be.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200811040016</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:12:56 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge, Lowry revived falsehood that Obama didn&#x27;t vote to condemn MoveOn Petraeus ad  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010003</link>
<description>The Drudge Report and the &#x3C;em&#x3E;National Review&#x27;s&#x3C;/em&#x3E; Rich Lowry falsely claimed that Sen. Barack Obama didn&#x27;t vote to condemn MoveOn.org&#x27;s 2007 newspaper advertisement critical of Gen. David Petraeus. In fact, Obama did vote for an amendment by Sen. Barbara Boxer that condemned the ad, as well as other attacks on past and present members of the armed forces, as the &#x3C;em&#x3E;USA Today&#x3C;/em&#x3E; blog post to which the Drudge Report linked points out.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200807010003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 Jul 2008 14:29:03 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge highlighted &#x3C;em&#x3E;Financial Times&#x3C;/em&#x3E; quote echoing false rumor about Obama&#x27;s religion  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200805120002</link>
<description>The Drudge Report ran the headline &#x22;West Virginia country folk keep distance from Obama: &#x27;I heard he&#x27;s a Muslim ...&#x27; &#x22; in linking to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;Financial Times &#x3C;/em&#x3E;article. The article quoted a West Virginia resident stating, &#x22;I heard Obama is a Muslim and his wife&#x27;s an atheist.&#x22; But Obama is, in fact, not a Muslim. While the article characterized the rumors of Obama&#x27;s religion as &#x22;unfounded,&#x22; it did so 12 paragraphs after quoting the &#x22;I heard he&#x27;s a Muslim&#x22; assertion and did not report that the Obamas are both Christians.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200805120002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:35:17 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Citing Drudge headline, MSNBC&#x27;s Brewer suggested Latinos would react negatively to Clinton campaign change  </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110007</link>
<description>While discussing the news that Sen. Hillary Clinton had replaced her campaign manager, MSNBC&#x27;s Contessa Brewer asked Kathleen Kennedy Townsend: &#x22;[T]he Drudge Report has a headline that reads, quote, &#x27;Adi&#x26;oacute;s: Clinton&#x27;s Top Latina Sidelined.&#x27; Are you concerned at all about the way Hispanic voters might interpret this shakeup heading into Texas?&#x22; Neither the Drudge Report nor MSNBC offered any reason why Solis Doyle&#x27;s replacement as campaign manager might have anything to do with her being Latina or any reason why Latino voters might react in any way to the staff change.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200802110007</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:03:50 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge headline  baselessly implicated Clinton in closure of  Niagara Falls  children&#x27;s psychiatric unit   </title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220010</link>
<description>A January 22 headline on the Drudge Report baselessly suggested that the  children&#x27;s psychiatric unit at Niagara  Falls Memorial  Medical Center closed because Sen. Hillary Clinton was  &#x22;neglecting&#x22; New  York. The &#x3C;em&#x3E;Buffalo  News&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article that the headline linked to contained no mention of  Clinton; rather, it reported that hospital officials attributed the closure to  problems surrounding the way Medicaid is administered by Niagara County.  </description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801220010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:53:13 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Following Drudge,  media outlets seize on Obama decision -- years ago -- to stop wearing flag pin</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710060001</link>
<description>Several media outlets -- following the lead of Internet gossip Matt Drudge -- have presented 
Obama&#x27;s comments on not wearing an American flag pin as a recent decision made 
by the candidate, and not an explanation of something he chose to do several 
years ago. CNN, ABC, and Fox News have reported on the &#x22;controversy,&#x22; providing 
a platform for several conservatives to attack Obama&#x27;s patriotism. As NBC News&#x27; 
Chuck Todd put it, &#x22;this was the media getting a classic case of the Drudges.&#x22;

&#x3C;br /&#x3E;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710060001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:01:14 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>From  cleavage to &#x22;cackle&#x22;? Media find new focus in coverage of Hillary  Clinton</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200710040003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2007 21:29:04 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge  Report, ABC highlight AP article that left out key data on Bush/Clinton  &#x22;dynasty&#x22; issue</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709290001</link>
<description>The Drudge Report and ABCNews.com both highlighted an Associated Press article 
that cited an NBC/&#x3C;em&#x3E;Wall Street 
Journal&#x3C;/em&#x3E; poll that, the article said, &#x22;found that fully one-quarter of 
all Americans said that the prospect of having at least 24 straight years of a 
President Clinton or Bush would be a consideration in their vote for president 
in 2008.&#x22; But the AP left out the data on 
other responses to the question 
-- that a majority of 
respondents, 54 
percent, said it would &#x22;not be 
a consideration at all.&#x22; Nor did the AP 
report that the poll also 
found that 42 percent of respondents &#x22;feel positive&#x22; that former President Bill 
Clinton is Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton&#x27;s (D-NY) husband, while only 28 percent 
&#x22;feel negative&#x22; about it.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709290001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:09:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge&#x27;s  false headline on Clinton health care plan: &#x22;HEALTH INSURANCE  PROOF REQUIRED FOR WORK&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180016</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200709180016</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:37:57 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Echoing misleading &#x3C;em&#x3E;NY Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; headline, Drudge reported that Clinton &#x22;supports national smoking ban&#x22;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280014</link>
<description>Linking to a &#x3C;em&#x3E;New
York Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article, whose headline asserted, &#x22;Hill Eyes National Cig Curb,&#x22; Matt Drudge wrote
&#x22;Hillary Supports National Smoking Ban.&#x22; In fact, as the &#x3C;em&#x3E;Post&#x3C;/em&#x3E; article noted, &#x22;Asked whether the
feds should impose a nationwide ban, Clinton
deferred to local governments.&#x22;</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200708280014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:35:26 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge,  MSNBC &#x22;fact-checker&#x22; Warren detect Clinton contradiction in  completely consistent statements</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200707240007</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200707240007</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 19:36:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media flacks for McCain&#x27;s false &#x22;flak&#x22; attack on Obama&#x27;s spelling</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705260002</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705260002</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:13:49 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>What haircut stories tell us about the press</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200705010001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 12:25:37 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge falsely claimed Soros funds &#x3C;em&#x3E;Media Matters&#x3C;/em&#x3E;</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130012</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704130012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:05:54 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Drudge + warbloggers = foolery</title>
<link>http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100023</link>
<description></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediamatters.org/items/200704100023</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:31:53 EST</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>